Sexuality

I'd like to suggest a test for evil and use homosexuality as the subject. The test is simple: an act can be called evil if it causes harm.

Reverend Lou Sheldon claims never to have said those words. Which is funny because he's said an awful lot of words like them!

Did Yule let Rageboy take over her blog while she was somewhere else?

"Hey, I like people coming up to me and saying 'Do you want to have sex with me?' So it's OK for me to ask, right?"

Many years ago, when I was in Greece, I picked up an icon of the Virgin Mary in a jewelry store and sent it home to my mother.

Jean Lund had a problem: As a sufferer of Persistant Sexual Arousal Syndrome (PSAS), she experienced orgasms hundreds of times each day.

I'd always suspected this of my locker room peers.

Never have I seen such an outrageous display of balls in my life!

During the 1950s, high school seniors could watch stag films, get drunk, and dance with "pert" and "plucky" girls and not have a hard on!

The peace of the garden could have been Eden.

What a future! Can't we think of another?

And it's entirely possible that the test is screwed up. It was correct 2/3s of the time. I wouldn't undergo transexual surgery with those odds.

In the wake of these revelations (more evidence that I have an enlarged clitoris), I went down the list of blogs in my daily walk. I discovered that according to Gender Genie, many people weren't what they seemed to be.

I don't know exactly why Shelley found it offensive in the context of her own blatantly sexual remarks. I add that I don't require an explanation. It suffices that Shelley announced that she found it offensive, that I had crossed her boundaries of propriety.

I feel bound to defend my honor as a small time penis pundit and present you my full answer to her question How important is a big dick, anyway?

Some of my friends who are gay and lesbian feel the need to defend the idea that as long as something a person does does no harm to anyone else, it is okay to do.

But it brings me back to an "overwhelming question" and you don't have to ask "What is it?" because I am going to tell you: in all our cultural criticism of sex sirens, what are we doing focusing on what the women do rather than on what men want?

I owe Britney Spears an apology for what I said the other day. She did not deserve to be called a whore.

Living in this world of violence pornography, surrounded by men who love it, can we really say that she is making a fully informed choice?

Civil libertarian that I am, allowing as I do the expression of many bizarre practices as long as they do no harm to those involved, I must scream that willing or not, this harms not only the woman who runs but all women.

Would I be the first? they asked themselves. Would I be the first to break Britney open and cause her belly to swell?

Living in a county where power plays and BDSM are common, I remain wary of the art of whips and chains.

I wonder, though, if there are others --women who register "masculine" or men who register "feminine" -- who don't feel a need to change their bodies and/or who aren't the attracted to their own sex yet fighting the fight to be themselves against all preconceptions out there?

I should like to trade places with a woman, body for body, for a month.

I'll show them my heart, but not my body. Which is the reverse, I think, of most men.

Red's actually touched on one of those vague life issues that I've been trying to put into words for a long time.

Now Karen and Kelly Caldwell both have me paranoid: each either implied or said straight out that she looks at crotches.

I'm not as stupid as the Piltdown Man....

IRC people will tell you nearly any thing in private, so long as you don't blurt it out on the channel.